A self-proclaimed ”death penalty agnostic,” Turow had to cross-examine his conscience when he served on a commission charged with reforming Illinois’ capital punishment system. Without a word of sermonizing, he delves beyond arguments about erroneous verdicts and the sanctity of human life to answer questions like, How does retribution differ from revenge? What are the costs of executing criminals versus locking them up for life? What kind of lives do unrepentant psychopaths lead in prison? What happens when they are released? What is owed to families of murder victims? Turow’s talents as a novelist – for telling a complex story with vivid characters, compassion, and humor – make this book unforgettably illuminating. I find myself contemplating crucial contradictions within our patriotic ideals about ”liberty and justice for all.” In a way, the very philosophy that empowers us as individuals has also deceived us about the capacity of the law to heal our deepest wounds.
Posted April 16 2004 — 12:00 AM EDT
- Vine star thanks little boy who stood up to her catcaller
- The new 'Men in Black' movie will have a woman in black
- Bindi Irwin hopes father Steve would be proud of her 'DWTS' win
- Bob Saget says Bill Cosby's reputation is now 'tarnished'
- 'The Hateful Eight' cast and crew nerds-out on 70 mm 'road show' cut
- John Stamos sentenced to 3 years probation for DUI
- Former Red Hot Chili Peppers guitarist John Frusciante releases free new music
- Taraji P. Henson's Biggest Moments in 2015
- Holiday Gift Guide: For the TV Fanatic
- 19 TV Families That Will Make You Thankful for Yours
- Literature's 8 Most Dysfunctional Thanksgiving Dinners
- 'Captain America: Civil War': Decoding the New Trailer
- EW's Entertainers of the Year pick their Entertainers of the Year