Michael Slezak
March 16, 2007 AT 07:06 PM EDT

There’s a pretty unexpected common thread in today’s newspaper reviews of the new time-warp thriller, Premonition. No, it’s not that critics liked the film — their assessments ranged from barely middling to downright dreadful — but rather, that its star, Sandra Bullock (pictured), manages to give a winning performance in spite of the lackluster material. Check out this roundup of reviews, and if you see it yourself this weekend, let your fellow PopWatchers know what you thought:

Chris Kaltenbach, Baltimore Sun: “Bullock is so good, working hard to pull off the transition from grief-stricken wife and mother to reluctant time traveler, you want to pull for her. So it’s possible —  not easy, but possible — to overlook the script’s inconsistencies.”

Michael Phillips, Chicago Tribune: “Bullock keeps her head down and acts with quietly considered intensity. It’s easy to forget that she’s a shrewd actress in many different genres, not just comedy. In drama, she’s not the sort of performer who seems to be making things up as she goes — she’s all about steady gazes and being in control, even when things are spinning out of control — but Bullock’s razor-sharp technique has saved many a lesser film.”

addCredit(“Premonition: Ron Batzdorff”)

Carla Meyer, McClatchy Newspapers: “Though her choice of project is troubling, Bullock gives a respectable performance as the sometime-widow, Linda.”

Betsy Pickle, Knoxville News Sentinel:”One of the things that makes Sandra Bullock a movie star is that shecan usually get audiences to go along on her film journeys, no matterhow far-fetched they are. That’s the case with Premonition, a time-fractured thriller that couldn’t possibly happen and yet manages to keep viewers on board.”

Roger Moore, Orlando Sentinel: “Confusing, convoluted and yet gripping and emotional — almost in spite of itself — Premonitionis the first movie Sandra Bullock has successfully ‘carried’ in years.She abandons any pretext of her perkiness and summons every last dropof empathy as a woman whose clairvoyance spells trouble for her life,her family and her marriage.”

David Germain, Associated Press:”Bullock is on screen virtually every moment of the movie and breathesfar more soul into the role than her superficially written charactermerits.”

Moira Macdonald, Seattle Times:”Bullock, a consistently underrated actress who’s very good here, is awelcome point of stillness in the whirling complications of the plot.As the action screeches back and forth from present to past toI-know-not-what, she keeps her performance quiet (except for a fewessential moments of rage), simple and clear. You connect with Linda,even as the movie leaves you behind.”

Claudia Puig, USA Today:”Bullock’s acting is fine, particularly when she’s challenged in someof the film’s better scenes to appear as if she’s going crazy. But whydoes she keep choosing such forced and clunky pseudo-surreal materiallike this movie and last year’s The Lake House.”

William Arnold, Seattle Post-Intelligencer:”Suffering through this thing, it’s hard not to get a little angry atBullock. She’s a unique star, and one who’s equally gifted at comedy (Two Weeks Notice) and drama (Infamous). Does she really need the money badly enough to do insipid potboilers like this?”

You May Like

Comments

EDIT POST