In the end, that hissing sound came not from a horde of vipers but from the air leaking out of the Snakes on a Plane phenomenon. After months of Internet obsession, the movie debuted with just $15.2 million—barely enough to finish No. 1, and below the most cynical of forecasts. (Even buzzless R-rated horror flicks like Silent Hill and Final Destination 3opened better this year.) To be fair, the film, which cost about $30 million, will likely make money once DVD sales are factored in, but here are three reasons why the slither to profitability will be longer than anticipated:
• Blogs Don't Equal Bucks
The big question was, Would webheads actually go see it? The answer: No.
Or at least they didn't bring friends. Bloggers gave SoaP an unexpected
boost, says New Line executive Rolf Mittweg, ''but did awareness
translate into dollars? I don't think so.''
• Young Men Aren't Reliable Moviegoers
New Line aimed for a demographic that has repeatedly proved to be
finicky and SoaP's stats bear that out. Just as many women showed up as
men, and, owing in part to its R rating, 53 percent of the film's
audience was older than 25. You can't make cash if your core crowd
doesn't show.
• Schlock Sells Just Like You'd Expect
Reviews were the one part of the whole SoaP experience that actually
beat expectations, but the fact is that most people pegged SoaP as a
goofy horror movie and stayed home. After all, nobody needed to buy a
ticket to be entertained by the best part: its title.
You Might Also Like
- DVD Review Snakes on a Plane (Jan 02, 2007) | Paul Katz
- Movie Review Snakes on a Plane (Aug 18, 2006) | Owen Gleiberman
- Movie News EW reminds us of the events of July and August 2006 (Aug 18, 2006) | Josh Wolk
- All About Snakes on a Plane
- Photo Gallery Staff Confessions: The ''bad'' movie I love (May 11, 2001)
- The Moviegoer Hindsight on ''Blair Witch,'' after ''Snakes'' tanked (Aug 18, 2006) | Owen Gleiberman


Home



