FLYNT STONE
Thanks for the story on Larry Flynt (#364, Jan. 31).
ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY seems to have a knack for presenting the
facts and assuming its readers are intelligent enough to make up
their own minds. Too bad the film didn't make that assumption.
It would have been nice if the movie treated its audience like
adults who can handle dissenting views instead of talking down
to us with First Amendment propaganda, however well-intentioned.
DAVID EPPLEY
Piscataway, N.J.
So Stone thinks that Flynt printed a photo of a woman being run
through a meat grinder ''as a joke.'' One can't help wondering: If
it was Stone's wife being run through the meat grinder, would
the punchline be quite so humorous?
STEVEN BAILEY
Jacksonville Beach, Fla.
I'm disappointed with the recent cover of EW. It looks like
something that should be on the cover of Hustler, not a family
magazine like EW. If I had kids, I wouldn't want them seeing
this picture sitting on my coffee table.
SHELLEY YOUNG
Negaunee, Mich.
HARD ROCK DISPLAY
I was appalled by the danger involved in making Asteroid. When I
read about the numerous close calls and that the executive
producer thanked God that no one was killed, I wondered if the
visual-effects company, Stargate Films, was in over its head.
After the Crow incident, I thought there'd be greater safety. No
one should risk their life for a special effect, no matter how
dazzling.
MIKE DRAKE
Middlesex, N.J.
EDITOR'S NOTE: According to executive producer John Davis, safety is a No. 1 priority. ''We would never risk a life to get a particular shot, but we would always prepare to confront any danger that might result from shooting this kind of movie.''
'STAR' LORES
You stated that the Reagan administration ''came up with a PR
coup in naming [its] cherished missile shield after Lucas' film''
(Star Wars). In fact, the appellation was never intended as
complimentary. Sen. Edward Kennedy (Mass.) accused the President
of using ''misleading red-scare tactics and reckless 'Star Wars'
schemes'' to push through larger military budgets. Rep. Ted Weiss
(N.Y.) criticized Reagan for promoting ''futuristic 'Star Wars'
schemes.'' The pejorative moniker quickly took hold in the news
media. In 1985 George Lucas even filed a lawsuit to prevent the
use of his trademarked title in two TV ad campaigns about
missile defenses, but he lost in court. In the end, the linkage
of Reagan's dream and Lucas' film was more a PR disaster than a
coup.
STEPHEN I. SCHWARTZ Director, U.S. Nuclear Weapons Cost Study
Project, the Brookings Institution
Washington, D.C.


Add your comment
The rules: Keep it clean, and stay on the subject or we might delete your comment. If you see inappropriate language, e-mail us. An asterisk * indicates a required field.